Self Improvement in Freemasonry

Self Improvement in Freemasonry

MASONIC EDITORIAL

Learning to Improve Myself in Masonry

 

I’ve often wondered since progressing through the degrees what “subdue my passions and improve myself in Masonry” truly means. What labors must one undertake? Does it mean from that moment until my last I should spend my time reflecting on the history, philosophy and symbolism behind the degrees I have undergone? I suppose those are a part of it. As humans we never truly stop learning, so I am sure that is the way it goes on our Masonic journey.

As an Entered Apprentice Mason, I was given a strong foundation to build upon as I continued from darkness to the Light of Masonry. A lot of this is accomplished through fellowship, and the study of, and participation in, ritual. By studying, listening to lectures, and contributing to degree work when I could, I learned the importance of the Working Tools and symbols in a more meaningful way. What is it about going to lodge that makes us better people? The meals, the Opening and Closing, the Secretary and Treasurer reports?

As I progressed through the degrees, certain phrases struck me because they sounded archaic and unusual. They were hard to understand, like a new language, but as I heard them more, my comprehension improved, and I realized I was learning every time I went to lodge. This is why it is important to attend and to memorize the work. Repetition and memorization help us comprehend the Masonic vocabulary. When the ritual is performed brilliantly, the words sound beautiful and poetic. In the beginning, many of us think memorization is either for the proficiency needed to advance through the degrees or for helping with the lodge’s ritual work. There must be more to it than that. The prose must be more than just pretty words.
Photo: (Left to Right) Bros. Michael Anthony Capparello and Russell W. Dickson (author)
I have heard that ritual’s real purpose is to provide us a roadmap to the East. I think the words and phrases are designed to pique our interest and encourage us to research their meanings. The floor work also is important, as officers discover in their respective stations and places. Sometimes, when performing my officer part, I’d feel discouraged because no matter how hard I’d try, I’d always have a Past Master correcting me. This too is part of the learning process whether I like it or not. Sometimes, two Past Masters approach me while disagreeing with each other — or worse, correct me when they were wrong and I was right. No one ever said the road East was easy, but I’m learning every day how that lesson is important.
These brothers were taught from the beginning of their own journeys the importance of these things and they were just trying to help me, so I try to listen and reflect no matter how hard it can be sometimes. To subdue our passions is another upright step in our journey, a means to be better men and to control ourselves by not taking things to excess—food, drink, smoking, gambling, our relationships. These things, if taken to extremes, fill our lives with darkness instead of Light. Each of us must learn what in ourselves to subdue. What we learn in Masonry will help us identify which passions we need to control. As we say, if our faith being in God is well founded with prayer and self-reflection, then success is ours for the taking. Each upright step helps us improve ourselves through life.

Photo: (Left to Right) Bros. Russell W. Dickson (author) and Paul Meher

Written by: Bro. Russell W. Dickson
Bro. Dickson is the Senior Deacon in St. Patrick’s Lodge 4 and is at labor in Collabergh-Radium 859, both in New York. He is a Royal Arch Mason in Hiram Union Chapter 53, and is a 32° Scottish Rite Mason at the Valley of Schenectady, where he serves as Senior Warden of Sigma Council Princes of Jerusalem.
Samuel Lloyd Kinsey
The Apron Presentation

The Apron Presentation

MASONIC RITUAL

THE APRON PRESENTATION

 

As Masons, we are well acquainted with the frequent use of symbolism, allegory and myth, not only to give substance to our ritual, but to exemplify, in tangible ways, the many abstract moral lessons so pertinent to the practice and philosophy of our Craft. We are told as we travel in search of Light that all the tools and trappings by which we are surrounded while in Lodge have practical uses when in the hands of our operative Brothers, but that we, as Free and Accepted Masons, are taught to use them for more noble and glorious purposes. Indeed, our ritual is so rich, our traditions so deep, that one could be forgiven for thinking that the founders of our Order created our history and usages from a marriage of thin air, operative experiences and, of course, The Holy Bible, from which our Brotherhood draws so much that is vital to our labor.
But, if we pay strict attention to the very rituals we cherish, we realize that its authors have always known full well that they existed within the framework of a larger, more material world, and used comparison and contrast to help us fix our place within it. One case where this is true is within the dialogue of one of our most revered and important sections of ritual: the Apron Presentation. During the course of that presentation, many references are made to aspects of history which existed outside of our Masonic world, and I’d like to examine one of them.

We are told, in the first paragraph, that the apron, as a symbol, is “more ancient than the Golden Fleece or Roman Eagle”. To what do these references allude?

Many of us are most familiar with the Golden Fleece as a result of the movies, and perhaps to a lesser extent from studying mythology in school. The origin of the fleece is, in itself, quite interesting. In mythology, the god Poseidon turned a nymph named Theophane into a sheep to hide her from her other suitors. He did this so that he alone, in his primitive Avatar form of a ram, could have sex with her. Their union resulted in a magical, winged ram whose fleece was golden. Later, when the spirit of queen Nephele learned that her husband, King Athamas, planned to sacrifice their children to stop a drought, she prayed that Poseidon would send the ram to fly them to safety. Sadly, her daughter, whose name was Helle, fell into the sea in the strait that is known, even until today, as the Hellespont! Her brother, Phraxis, arrived safely in the land then known as Colchis and sacrificed the ram to its father Poseidon. Poseidon commemorated the event by placing the ram in the sky as the constellation Ares, and Phraxis hung the golden hide in a tree as a token of gratitude and a symbol of kingship. The story of Jason and the Argonauts has been a popular theme in Hollywood, as it is a heroic tale of adventure and danger. But how may we claim that our apron is older than a yarn that is probably a pure myth? Interestingly, the Greek word “mythos” means “word” or “true narrative”. So, the myth, to the Greeks, was the actual truth, as they knew it, and as well as the recording methods of the day permitted.

As it happens, a team of geologists led by Avtandil Okrostvaridze from Ilia State University in formerly Soviet Georgia has found evidence to suggest that this was an actual event! Based on the examination of both artifacts and the archeological record, these researchers believe that an expedition traveled, perhaps from Thessaloniki in Greece to the ancient kingdom of Colchis on the shores of the Black Sea. In what is now modern-day Georgia and Turkey, they went to learn the method of extracting gold sand from river and stream beds.

The evidence suggests that it was the Colchins who developed the method of sluicing the gold-bearing sediment from the riverbed across the skin of a ram or lamb with the fleece side upward. While the rushing water would carry away the sand and other lighter particles, the heavy gold dust would settle and become trapped among the curly wool fibers. This method is still in use today among many recreational prospectors.

Much study has been done of this process, called “selective attachment” or “beneficiation”, where it turns out, many forces are at work, including gravity, the static charge on the fleece and the natural stickiness caused by the lanolin and other oils in the sheep’s hide. Today’s miners use burlap or synthetic mats called “miner’s moss” engineered to the purpose, and while they are easier to empty of their golden harvest, they are no more efficient in the actual collection process than their Colchin predecessor. And so, our historical Jason’s voyage may have been not so much to capture some magical treasure of the Gods, as it was to learn the method used by the Colchins to readily collect gold without the dangers and uncertainty of mining. Since countries, even today, still jealously guard technologies that give them commercial or military advantages, attempting to acquire this knowledge may well have been just as dangerous as the brass bulls and sleeping dragon our mythical Jason needed to triumph over in order to claim his prize. The archeological record would indicate this as happening approximately 3,000 years ago. Since the biblical record tells us that the Temple was built in about 970 BCE, and we might assume that the system of aprons as identifying badges for the different bands of workmen would already have been in use, our claim of our apron tradition being older than the Fleece would be correct, even if only marginally.

Masonically, it is interesting to note that, in this passage of ritual, we compare our lambskin to what is actually yet another lambskin. And although that other one may have been heavy laden with its golden cargo, in our traditions, our simple, white version is surely held as the more precious of the two.

Written by: WB Marty Moscicki Raised at Elbe-Garfield-Goelet Lodge No. 889 in the 7th Manhattan District. Affiliated with Old Town Lodge #908 and had the privilege of serving as its W:.Master in 2014-2015. Bro. Moscicki currently resides in East Quogue, NY and Delray Beach, FL
Samuel Lloyd Kinsey
Masonic Ritual – Changeover or Close to another Degree?

Masonic Ritual – Changeover or Close to another Degree?

MASONIC RITUAL

Changeover or Close to another Degree?

MASONIC RITUAL EXPLAINED BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE CUSTODIANS OF THE WORK

Can we open on the First Degree and use the Changeover to move to the Second Degree?

In the Grand Lodge of New York,

No, the Changeover cannot be so used.

Although the ability to open a communication of a Lodge on any of the three Degrees of Masonry greatly reduces the need to work in more than one Degree on any given evening, some foreseeable cases remain in which this would be desired. For example, a Lodge might like to examine an Entered Apprentice’s proficiency in open Lodge and confer the Fellowcraft Degree upon him at the same communication. In the Grand Lodge of New York, we have two ways of moving from one Degree to another: the Changeover and the procedural Ritual to Close to a Lodge of a Different Degree.

The Changeover achieves this by dispensing with labor in the Third Degree in order to temporarily impose the symbolic rules of a lower Degree in a Master Mason Lodge without opening a Lodge of that Degree. Since the Master Mason Lodge is still open and its labor merely set aside for a time, that labor must be resumed and the Master Mason Lodge must be closed. This is why the Lodge must return to the Third Degree after work and labor in a lower Degree has concluded. The Masonic rationale for “waiving all signs and ceremonies”—which refers to a lengthier procedure no longer in use that incorporated signs and ceremonies drawn from the Rituals of Opening for the lower Degrees—is that the Third Degree inherently embraces the lower Degrees and the signs of those Degrees were displayed during the Master Mason opening.

With the possibility of opening the communication of a Lodge on any of the three Degrees of Masonry, however, the Changeover’s rationale is no longer always valid. If a Lodge opens on the First Degree and desires to move to the Second Degree, we must observe that none of the signs of Fellowcraft will have been displayed, nor are the ceremonies of a Fellowcraft Lodge embraced by the First Degree. Moreover, it’s inconvenient to have to resume labor in the original Degree at the end of the meeting. The solution was to revive the historical New York Masonic practice of closing from one Degree to another Degree.

The procedural Ritual to Close to a Lodge of a Different Degree, which is found in the 2019 printing of the Ritual Book, waives the closing ceremonies for the current Degree and most but not all of the opening ceremonies for the target Degree. The portion of the opening ceremonies that is not waved consists of the catechism dialogue and display of signs, after which the Great Lights are adjusted as necessary and the Tiler informed. This not only ensures that the signs and ceremonies of the target Degree have been performed, but eliminates the requirement to return to the original Degree. Closing to a Lodge of Another Degree takes about 70 seconds longer than the Changeover, and both the Master and Senior Warden should be conversant in the catechisms for the Rituals of Opening in all three Degrees.

Response provided by RW Samuel Lloyd Kinsey
Chairman, Custodians of the Work, Grand Lodge of New York

Note: This site is an excellent source of information about Freemasonry. While every effort has been made to provide accurate and up-to-date information about Masonic Ritual, please remember that a website is not a substitute for your jurisdiction’s Standard Work or Approved Ritual.
Samuel Lloyd Kinsey
Masonic Ritual – Examinations in Open Lodge

Masonic Ritual – Examinations in Open Lodge

MASONIC RITUAL

Examinations in Open Lodge

MASONIC RITUAL EXPLAINED BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE CUSTODIANS OF THE WORK

Do Entered Apprentices and Fellowcrafts have to be examined in open Lodge before they progress to the next Degree?

In the Grand Lodge of New York,

Proficiency doesn’t have to be ascertained in open Lodge, but it does have to be ascertained. The Masonic Law of the Grand Lodge of New York says that a Brother seeking to advance must demonstrate suitable proficiency in the preceding Degree either by examination in open Lodge or by a committee, as directed by the Master. “Suitable” in this context means “adequate; satisfying propriety” which means that it is up to the Lodge to decide what constitutes suitable satisfaction of the Lodge’s proficiency criteria by any given candidate for advancement. Generally speaking “examination” means giving the answers in the Lecture of Forms and Ceremonies at whatever level of accuracy and thoroughness the Lodge may require, but proficiency also could include any number of other things such as delivering a short paper at a Lodge meeting, completing a reading course, observing a conferral of that Degree, attending certain classes, and so on. Much of this will come down to the traditions and expectations of each Lodge.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, a candidate should not be examined on the catechisms in open Lodge unless it is certain he will pass with sufficient proficiency. Needless to say, a Brother should never be brought before the Lodge for examination if it is known he is not proficient to the Lodge’s criteria. Even then, we all have known that Brother who nails the Qs & As in practice sessions then blows it in front of the Lodge due to anxiety. There is never, ever any good reason to embarrass a Brother in front of his Lodge. I would suggest that the examination which “counts” should be done by a committee in a setting that makes the candidate for advancement comfortable. This should be reported and recorded in the proceedings and, if the Lodge desires and the candidate is comfortable doing so, all or some of the catechisms can be exemplified in a Communication. Another possibility that has been done by Lodges with extended Degree cycles is to have candidates for advancement exemplify the Lecture of Forms and Ceremonies when the Lodge confers the Degree upon another candidate. A final consideration is time: It takes about a dozen minutes for a fully proficient Brother to go through the complete Qs & As for the Entered Apprentice Degree. Depending on the number of candidates for advancement and the contemplated work of the evening, open examinations could be lengthy and—it must be admitted—not terribly interesting for the other attendees. These are all things a Lodge should consider in deciding whether to conduct its examinations in open Lodge or not. There is no wrong answer, although there are inadvisable ways of doing it either way.

Response provided by RW Samuel Lloyd Kinsey
Chairman, Custodians of the Work, Grand Lodge of New York

Note: This site is an excellent source of information about Freemasonry. While every effort has been made to provide accurate and up-to-date information about Masonic Ritual, please remember that a website is not a substitute for your jurisdiction’s Standard Work or Approved Ritual.
Samuel Lloyd Kinsey
Masonic Ritual – Does “Brethren” Trigger the Sign of Fidelity?

Masonic Ritual – Does “Brethren” Trigger the Sign of Fidelity?

MASONIC RITUAL

Does “Brethren” Trigger the Sign of Fidelity?

 

MASONIC RITUAL EXPLAINED BY THE CHAIRMAN OF THE CUSTODIANS OF THE WORK

Is it correct that everyone should come to the Sign of Fidelity when the Master says “Brethren”?

In the Grand Lodge of New York the answer is “yes” for most cases, but not all cases.

Under the “General Principles” section of the Ritual Book It says that the Sign of Fidelity “is required during Work at the Altar, during prayer, whenever directly addressed, either collectively or individually, by an officer of higher rank, and whenever addressing the same. It is not required for general declarations or ordinary discourse while the Lodge is seated, and Candidates do not give this sign while receiving their Degrees. It is given only by Masons who are wearing an Apron.” Let’s focus on the part that talks about interacting with an officer of higher rank. The Master in his Lodge outranks everyone except the Grand Master, Deputy Grand Master and the District Deputy Grand Master. As a result, any time the Master addresses or is addressed by a Brother in Lodge, that Brother should be at the Sign of Fidelity. As explained in a previous post, “Brethren” should be used whenever addressing all the Masons in the Lodge room, whereas “Brothers” is used when addressing multiple Masons but not all Masons in the room. Thus, when the Master says the word “Brethren,” every Mason in the room should come to the Sign of Fidelity because they are being addressed by an officer of higher rank. Why only in “most cases” and not all cases? Because the Sign of Fidelity is not required for “ordinary discourse while the Lodge is seated.” A representative example of this would be the reading and approval of minutes when the Master says, “Brethren, give your attention to the reading of the minutes.” The Lodge is seated at that moment and the Master’s is engaged in ordinary discourse. The Brethren are not required to jump to their feet and come to the Sign of Fidelity just because the Master said, “Brethren.”  However, if the Master were to speak the same words while the Lodge was raised, all present should come to the Sign of Fidelity. The answers provided here reflect GLNY customs, rules, and ritual. We welcome discussion about how these may differ in your jurisdiction.

Response provided by RW Samuel Lloyd Kinsey
Chairman, Custodians of the Work, Grand Lodge of New York

Note: This site is an excellent source of information about Freemasonry. While every effort has been made to provide accurate and up-to-date information about Masonic Ritual, please remember that a website is not a substitute for your jurisdiction’s Standard Work or Approved Ritual.
Samuel Lloyd Kinsey